The New Cooperative Identity and Agricultural Cooperatives in Türkiye
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63556/ankad.v10i2.330Keywords:
cooperativism, traditional cooperatives, commercial cooperatives, agricultural sector, TürkiyeAbstract
Due to the continuing significance of the agricultural sector in Türkiye today, agricultural cooperatives, whose primary functions include providing inputs and credit to their members/partners, harvesting, storage, processing, marketing, and selling their products, are important organizations. The United Nations has declared 2025 as the international year of cooperatives, while the FAO has emphasized the important role of cooperatives in the fight against hunger and malnutrition, particularly in the agri-food sector. However, there are various obstacles that hinder the ability of cooperatives to perform their functions and maintain their existence. In order to overcome these challenges, it is essential to discuss not only the protection of their universal principles and identity but also the possibility of engaging in commercial activities. An examination of data obtained from official institutions and relevant studies indicates that agricultural cooperatives suffer from limited effectiveness and weak competitiveness due to inadequate capital accumulation. Consequently, it is seen that it is important for agricultural cooperatives to engage in commercial activities and generate capital while preserving their universal principles and identity, in order to become stronger and more efficient and to ensure their long-term sustainability.
References
Barton, D., Boland, M., Chaddad, F., & Eversull, E. (2011). Current challenges in financing agricultural cooperatives. Choices, 26(3). DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.117410.
Brass, T. (2007). How Agrarian Cooperatives Fail: Lessons From 1970s Peru, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 34(2), 240-287.
Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye - CBRT (2025). www.tcmb.gov.tr (Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası-TCMB)
Çelik, M. & Korkmaz, E. (2023). Türkiye Tarım Kredi Kooperatiflerinin Finansal Performansının Likidite, Finansal Yapı ve Kârlılık Göstergeleri Açısından Analizi, Sosyal Bilimlerde Akademik Araştırma ve Değerlendirmeler-V içinde (Ed. Ali ŞAHİN) S.343-361, Özgür Yayınları.
EUROSTAT (2026). Employment by detailed industry (NACE Rev.2), https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10_a64_e/default/table?lang=en
FAO (2022). Agricultural cooperatives, responsible sourcing and risk-based due diligence, http://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/a33b508d-9429-4f01-b6a2-eba1be940f79/content
FAO (2025). https://www.fao.org/policy-support/news/detail/fao-highlights-the-cooperative-model-as-a-key-driver-in-the-fight-against-hunger-and-poverty/en 27/02/2025
Hansen, M., Morrow, J. L. & Batista, J. C. (2002). The Impact of Trust on Cooperative Membership Retention, Performance and Satisfaction: An Exploratory Study. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 5(1), 41-59.
ILO (2022). Measuring Cooperatives: An information guide on the ILO Guidelines concerning Statistics of Cooperatives. www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_emp/@emp_ent/@coop/documents/publication/wcms_858833.pdf
ILO (2022a). Agriculture: a hazardous work. https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/safety-and-health-at-work/areasofwork/hazardous-work/WCMS_110188/lang--en/index .htm
İNGEV (2021). Sosyal Dayanışma Ekonomisi İçin Güçlü Kooperatifçilik, https://ingev.org/raporlar/Sosyal_Dayanisma_Ekonomisi_icin_Guclu_Kooperatifcilik.pdf
Kafaoğlu, B. (2001). Tarım Bolluk İçinde Yoksulluk, Kaynak Yayınları:337, ISBN: 975-343-335-2, İstanbul.
Kılıç Topuz, B. (2017). Samsun İli Tarımsal Üretici Birliklerinde Güven ve Performansa Etkili Faktörler. (Doktora Tezi). Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Samsun. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=q3 d9QtLoVA2OMExHSkJpf2m8ssBMAlSSledUgh gOAwu3MpsIpzfHPv45Ba-m2Oi
Önal, N. E. (2012). Anadolu Tarımının 150 Yıllık Öyküsü, Yazılama Yayınevi: 42, ISBN: 978-605-5892-34-0, İstanbul.
Pamuk, Ş. (2014). Türkiye’nin 200 Yıllık İktisadi Tarihi, İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2024). 2024 Yılı idare Faaliyet Raporu. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SGB/Belgeler/Bakanl%C4%B1k_Faaliyet_Raporlar%C4%B1/Tar%C4%B1m%20ve%20Orman%20Bakanl%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1%202024%20Y%C4%B1l%C4%B1%20%C4%B0dare%20Faaliyet%20Raporu.pdf (Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı).
Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Trade (2024). Kooperatif Bülteni Aralık 2024. https://esnafkoop.ticaret.gov.tr/data/670cc06f13b876dc68d93013/Kooperatif%20B%C3%BClteni%20Aral%C4%B1k%202024.pdf (Ticaret Bakanlığı).
Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Trade (2025). https://ticaret.gov.tr/kooperatifcilik/kooperatifler-hakkinda-bilgiler/tarihce#_ftn16
Sak, R., Şahin Sak, I. T., Şendik, Ç. Ö. &Nas, E. (2021). Bir araştırma yöntemi olarak doküman analizi, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, cilt 4, sayı 1, 227-256, doi.org/10.33400/kuje.843306.
Soysal, M. (2006). Köy Sosyolojisi, Ç. Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Genel Yayın No: 211. Ders Kitapları Yayın No: A-66, 2. Baskı, Adana.
Susam, N. & Bakkal, U. (2008). Türkiye’de Tarım Politikalarında Dönüşümün Kamu Bütçesi ve Ekonomi Üzerindeki Etkileri, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, C.X, SI, ss.327-357.
Turkish Statistical Institute-TURKSTAT (2025). www.tuik.gov.tr (Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu-TÜİK)
Von Pischke, J. D. & Rouse, J. G. (2004). New strategies for mobilizing capital in agricultural cooperatives, https://www.fao.org/4/y5469e/y5469e04.htm#bm4.4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Anatolian Cultural Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


