The Relationship of Qualitative Choice Model and International Migration, Employment and Mobile Telephone Subscriptions: A Study Within the EU Candidate Countries

Authors

Keywords:

International migration, panel qualitative choice models, employment, EU candidate countries

Abstract

Due to globalization, migration has become an issue that affects the entire world. Therefore, almost all countries in the world are affected by migration. The century we are in can be called the 'age of migration' in response to the increase in international migration. In general, the main reasons for people's emigration are economic, social, political, but basically it is the desire to get a better job, better working conditions, in short, the dream of living better. Considering the 2002-2020 annual time frame for the countries of Turkey, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia, which are in the category of candidate countries for the European Union (EU) membership, this study, which investigates the effect of labor force participation and mobile phone subscriptions on international migration, will be estimated by panel logit and panel probit models, which are panel qualitative preference models. When the panel logit model prediction results were taken into consideration, it was concluded that the labor force and mobile phone subscription variables were significant in explaining migration. An increase in the labor force that may occur, increases the likelihood of an increase in migration by about 6 times. However, although the mobile phone subscription variable was found to be significant in explaining migration, it was concluded that the increase in the number of mobile users reduced the probability of an increase in the migration variable by 2.04 times.

References

Ager, P. & Brückner, M. (2013, September). Cultural diversity and economic growth: evidence from the US. European Economic Review, 64, 76-97.

Aktaş, M. T. (2015). Göç olgusu ekonomik kalkınmada itici güç olabilir mi? Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(7), 37-48.

Boubtane, E., Coulibaly, D. & Rault, C. (2013). Immigration, unemployment and gdp in the host country: bootstrap panel granger causality analysis on OECD countries. Economic Modelling, 33, 261–269.

Bove, V. & Elia, L. (2017). Migration, diversity, and economic growth. World Development, 89, 227- 239.

Chen, H.-j. & Fang, I.-H. (2013). Migration, social security, and economic growth. Economic Modelling, 32 (C), 386-399.

Chletsos, M. & Roupakias, S. (2012). Immigration, unemployment and growth: empirical evidence from Greece. MPRA (Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 39927, posted 08 Jul 2012 07:26 UTC

Cooray, A. (2012). The Impact of migrant remittances on economic growth: evidence from south asia. Review of International Economics, 5(20), 985-998.

Deniz, T. (2014). Uluslararası göç sorunu perspektifinde Türkiye. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 181, 175-204. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tsadergisi/issue/21491/230375

Di Maria, C. & Lazarova, E. A. (2012). Migration, human capital formation, and growth: an empirical investigation. World Development, 40(5), 938-955.

Dolado, J., Goria, A. & Ichino, A. (1994). Immigration, human capital and growth in the host country. Journal of Population Economics 7, 193-215.

Dustmann, C., Fabbri, F. & Preston, I. (2005). The impact of immigration on the British labour market. The Economic Journal, 115(507), F324-F341.

Engin, C. & Konuk, T. (2020). Türkiye ekonomisinde uluslararası göçün işsizlik ve ekonomik büyüme üzerine etkisi: ekonometrik bir analiz. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(10), 103-123.

Eren, A. A. (2021). Malthus ve Marx’da nüfus, istihdam ve suç: 2011 sonrası Türkiye’ye gelen göçmenlerin ekonomik etkileri. Başkent Üniversitesi Ticari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 23-36.

Göç Terimleri Sözlüğü. (2021). Erişim Tarihi: 07.10.2021, www.turkey.iom.int: http://www.turkey.iom.int/documents/goc_terimleri_sozlugu.pdf No:18

Günay, E. & Çelik, O. (2021). Yakın tarihte Afrika ve Asya’dan Türkiye’ye göçün çekim modeli ile analizi. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 32(2), 505-524.

Kelley, A. C. (1965). International migration and economic growth: Australia, 1865–1935. The Journal of Economic History, 25(3), 333-354.

Kemnitz, A. (2001). Endogenous growth and the gains from immigration. Economics Letters, 72(2), 215-218.

Kıraç, İ. (2017). Yönetişim ve yetenek eksenli bir bakışla mülteci sorununun çözümü: Aziz Mahmud Hüdayi vakfı örneği. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Karaman.

Koçak, Y. & Terzi, E. (2012). Türkiye’de göç olgusu, göç edenlerin kentlere olan etkileri ve çözüm önerileri. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, III (3), 173-175.

Kundu, N., Banu, A. & Sehreen, F. (2012). Workers’ remittances impact on the economic growth: Evidence from capital inflows in Bangladesh. MPRA (Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 65340, posted 01 Jul 2015 05:34 UTC

Latif, E. (2015). The relationship between immigration and unemployment: panel data evidence from Canada. Economic Modelling, 50, 162–167.

Marr, W. L. & Siklos, P. L. (1994). The link between immigration and unemployment in Canada. Journal of Policy Modeling, 16(1), 1-25.

Meçik, O. & Koyuncu, T. (2020). Türkiye'de göç ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Toda- Yamamoto nedensellik testi. Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches, 9(3), 2618 - 2635.

Mihi-Ramirez, A., Rudzionis, A. & Kumpikaite, V. (2014). European economic migration flow, earnings and unemployment in decade of 2000. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 122-129.

Morley, B. (2006). Causality between economic growth and immigration: an ARDL bounds testing approach. Economics Letters, 90(1),72-76.

Nyamongo, E. M., Misati, R. N., Kipyegon, L. & Ndirangu, L. (2012). Remittances, financial development and economic growth in Africa. Journal of Economics and Business, 64(3), 240-260.

Özdı̇l, S. (2019). ABD İşgücü piyasasında ücretler ve göç ilişkisi: Neoklasik göç teorisi.

Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 264-276.

Sağlam, S. (2006). Türkiye'de iç göç olgusu ve kentleşme. Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5, 1-13.

Sayın, Y., Usanmaz, A. & Aslangiri, F. (2016). Uluslararası göç olgusu ve yol açtığı etkiler: Suriye göçü örneği. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 18 (31), 1-13.

StataCorp. (2015). Stata longitudınal-data/panel-data reference manual: release 14. statistical software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.

Şahin, A., Aktaş, E. & Rad, S. T. (2021). Türkiye’de kırdan kente göç-işsizlik: Todaro paradoksu. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 27(1), 9-14.

Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2012) İleri panel veri analizi stata uygulamalı. İstanbul: Beta Basım.

Tarasyev, A. A. & Jabbar, J. B. (2018). Dynamic modeling of labor migration impact on the economic system development. IFAC Papers OnLine, 32(51), 407–412.

T.C. İçişleri Bakanlığı, Göç Dairesi Başkanlığı, (2021), Göç tarihi. https://www.goc.gov.tr/goc- tarihi (Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2021)

Türk Dil Kurumu (2021) Erişim tarihi: 01.10.2021, www.tdk.gov.tr, 2021.

Yıldırımoğlu, H. (2005). Uluslararası emek göçü “Almanya’ya Türk emek göçü”. Kamuİş İş Hukuku ve İktisat Dergisi, VIII, 1-24.

Published

2022-04-25

How to Cite

KAPLAN, E. A., GÜLER, İlkay, & KIRAÇ, İsmail. (2022). The Relationship of Qualitative Choice Model and International Migration, Employment and Mobile Telephone Subscriptions: A Study Within the EU Candidate Countries. Journal of Anatolian Cultural Research (JANCR), 6(1), 16–30. Retrieved from https://ankad.org/index.php/ankad/article/view/124

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.